I've had a lot of trouble offsetting and thickening compound
surfaces where the offset value is larger than the minimum radius on the
surface and so Pro/E gets upset. I then spend hours trying to modify the surface
to increase the radius while still getting the surface I want.
I didn't think there was an easy way round this, Automatic offset is usually
pretty poor, and often the outside surface is the critical one so modeling the
inside surface does not make much sense.
However, I've just found the Pro/E will offset the following surface of a
simple extrude and let the inside radius intersect itself. If it can do this,
which seems straightforward enough, why can't it do the same thing with
compound surfaces offsets?
While on the subject, has anyone got any techniques they use when confronted by
the above problem?
View attachment 2883
surfaces where the offset value is larger than the minimum radius on the
surface and so Pro/E gets upset. I then spend hours trying to modify the surface
to increase the radius while still getting the surface I want.
I didn't think there was an easy way round this, Automatic offset is usually
pretty poor, and often the outside surface is the critical one so modeling the
inside surface does not make much sense.
However, I've just found the Pro/E will offset the following surface of a
simple extrude and let the inside radius intersect itself. If it can do this,
which seems straightforward enough, why can't it do the same thing with
compound surfaces offsets?
While on the subject, has anyone got any techniques they use when confronted by
the above problem?
View attachment 2883