Continue to Site

Welcome to MCAD Central

Join our MCAD Central community forums, the largest resource for MCAD (Mechanical Computer-Aided Design) professionals, including files, forums, jobs, articles, calendar, and more.

Swept Blend Problem.

Try entering a value in the range you are given and complete the feature. Then select the feature and right mouse click>Edit and change the thickness to 5 then regenrate to see if ProE will accept the value.
 
I just tried that, it didn't work. Thanks anyway.

Someone told me to change something with tolerance's but I didn't really understand what they were talking about.

Anyone else got ne ideas?
 
the problem is accuracy!! Change it and it will work
smiley2.gif
(look under : edit - setup - accuracy)


Pro/e makes a box around the complete modell , and then it calculates the "longest distans" inside the box (in other words, the distanse between one corner to another...) . Then pro/e takes this distans and divides it whit your accuracy value ( default 0.0012) and thevalue you get it the "smallest" value/distanse/lenght you can have in your modell.


So, if you change your accuracy , you can have a smaller value , in your case "5" .


but , you will get a heavier cad modell....


Good luck!!


//Tobias
Edited by: tobbo
 
> Someone told me to change something with tolerance's but
> I didn't really understand what they were talking about.


Slog thru ...
[url]http://groups.google.com/group/comp.cad.pro-engineer/browse_ thread/thread/7ac7b385bb720124/24fc891e008c7ebe?lnk=st&q =#24fc891e008c7ebe[/url]
... and the linked docs and you'll know all about it. ;)
(Search for "dynamic" if you want to cut to the chase.)


If you're on maint there are several informative KB articles related to
accuracy / system tolerance settings and issues.


And then, fwiw;
"I am given to understand absolute accuracy will be the default
setting in WF5, so this sort of problem should go away."
[url]http://groups.google.com/group/comp.cad.pro-engineer/browse_ thread/thread/76104510fabf8530/dd2923e5948e4438 [/url]
 
The accuracy is probably the problem. With this you should be able to make a thin part or shell a solid.


You can alsomake a surface feature and then thicken.
 
hi will,


as rightly said by tobbo, this is a problem of relative accuracy. Any edge less than (length of the cuboiddiagonal * relative accuracy) is considered short edge, so feature generation fails.


you can creat it as a solid or a surface, I think thickness isnot an issue here at all. i think this is just for representation. even you are not going to creat drawings of it, because nobody can manufacture a 25m long single piece pole!!!


you may consider it doing as an assembly, if the thickness reallymatters toyou. you can have a skeleton part with surfs only. make apublish geometry surfacesand each individual parts created using this copy geom surfs and required thickness given in part level.
Edited by: rudresh.hm
 

Sponsor

Back
Top