To Exist or Not to Exist

[MNMcAllister]

It has been proposed to me to open a debate on the theme of relatively accurate bevel gear tooth creation in Pro/ENGINEER.


This same topic, under identical headings, is being posted to the following discussion boards:
www.eng-tips.com
www.mcadcentral.com
www.cadproe.com
www.cad-portal.com
www.tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/pro-e/
groups.google.com/group/comp.cad.pro-engineer
www.proe.com


So, if a reader also frequents any of the above that is not the same as this group, please only contribute to one.
After two weeks I will compile the results and post a follow-up t all groups.


It is my wish that any moderator post this as expediently as possible.


Now, on for the main attraction:
1)Should certain features of models be simplified so as to not over complicate the creation process (long regen time)? Some examples would be cosmetic threads for fastener or ball screw threads or circular arcs for spur type gear teeth or trapezoidal sections for bevels.


2)To see it from the other side, should models be created to be as realistic as possible?
Please respond with a brief opinion, 10 sentence max., as to why you think this way. A separate response, same length, to each is welcomed; some people can see merits in both.


Thank you,
Mark N. McAllister

 

[JohnMilem]

It depends on the situation. When we export the file directly to CAM then we include all the detail that we can to save the machine operator time and effort in programing the part. As you have pointed out we have to be aware of the file size, on some very complex parts the file size can be larger than what we can directly transfer. When this happens we have zip the files. If we are going to send the piece outside or not use the CAM software then use the first option.


Thanks John